<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"><channel><title>under the cheap seats</title><link>http://underthecheapseats.blog.co.uk/</link><description>the detail supporting the view...</description><language>en-UK</language><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs><item><title>In response to:about this blog</title><description>Sense?&lt;br&gt;
Who wants sense?&lt;br&gt;
I refuse sense&lt;br&gt;
at all time&lt;br&gt;
Always&lt;br&gt;
x</description><link>http://underthecheapseats.blog.co.uk/2006/01/28/about_this_blog~514492/#c2735146</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:49:01 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:one of my favourite postcards</title><description>it's kind of inherently democratic really as the success of a resistence movement is going to be directly proportional to the number of committed members it has,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
the more widely agreed a definition of 'injustice' you get, the more likely you are to successfully resist it,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
there isn't one single moral code, no matter how hard we look, so in the end people's own consciences are all we have to rely on, this postcard could just as easily say 'don't pass the buck' for me,</description><link>http://underthecheapseats.blog.co.uk/2006/01/20/one_of_my_favourite_postcards~490559/#c587666</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:12:31 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:one of my favourite postcards</title><description>Point made - depending on who makes the decision and under what circumstances - how abot that?</description><link>http://underthecheapseats.blog.co.uk/2006/01/20/one_of_my_favourite_postcards~490559/#c584105</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:41:02 +0100</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
